Complainant vs respondent

SUPREME COURT Manila. EN BANC . A.M. No. 1625 February 12, 1990. ANGEL L. BAUTISTA, complainant, vs. ATTY. RAMON A. GONZALES, respondent. R E S O L U T I O N . PER CURIAM: In a verified complaint filed by Angel L. Bautista on May 19, 1976, respondent Ramon A. Gonzales was charged with malpractice, deceit, gross misconduct and violation of lawyer's oath..

respondent against herein complainant is an act done contrary to justice, honesty, modesty and good morals. The ling of perjury case with. P20,000,000.00 damages against respondent is intended merely to harass, to. injure, and oppress the complainant; 8. These practices committed by respondent are unprofessional and.Complainant Roberto L. Obiedo (Obiedo) filed a case for Estafa against the Spouses Nino Rico and Mary Anne Nery (Nery Spouses). The case, docketed as Criminal Case No. 2012-0426, was raffled to respondent Judge's sala. After trial on the merits, respondent Judge rendered a Judgment dated 17 December 2018, 2 acquitting the Nery Spouses, but ...Complainant Roberto L. Obiedo (Obiedo) filed a case for Estafa against the Spouses Nino Rico and Mary Anne Nery (Nery Spouses). The case, docketed as Criminal Case No. 2012-0426, was raffled to respondent Judge's sala. After trial on the merits, respondent Judge rendered a Judgment dated 17 December 2018, 2 acquitting the Nery Spouses, but ...

Did you know?

I n Flores vs. Chua, the respondent lawyer was disbarred after he was found guilty of notarizing a forged deed of sale. The penalty of disbarment was imposed because in a previous administrative case, respondent was found guilty of violating Rule 1.01[16] of the Code of Professional Responsibility.In his report [36] dated 14 October 2003, Executive Judge Racoma found that there was an attorney-client relationship between the complainant and the respondent. To arrive at this conclusion, the Executive Judge took judicial notice of the Notice of Attorney’s Lien which contradicts respondent’s claim that he did not stand as counsel for ...respondent. The respondent is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal. The respondent can be either the plaintiff or the defendant from the court below, as either party can appeal the decision thereby making themselves the petitioner and their adversary the respondent.

April 10, 2019. B.M. No. 3288. MERCURIA D. SO, Complainant vs. MA. LUCILLE P. LEE,* Respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. REYES, J. JR., J.: Subject of this Resolution are the October 9, 20171 and March 15, 20192 Petitions to Retake the Lawyer's Oath and to Sign the Roll of Attorneys of Ma. Lucille P. Lee (Lee), one of the successful examinees of the …A Formal Complaint is a written document requesting that MIT investigate the allegation of discrimination or discriminatory harassment against a student. The parties are the Complainant and the Respondent, who have equal opportunity to participate in the investigation and resolution process. The Investigator is neutral and confidential. The parties can agree to participate in Adaptable Resolution or seek supportive measures.[A.C. No. 10952. January 26, 2016.] ENGEL PAUL ACA , complainant, vs. ATTY. RONALDO P. SALVADO , respondent. DECISION. PER CURIAM : p. This …Complainant also revealed that respondent filed two (2) other administrative cases against a judge and an assisting judge in the RTC of Lucena City, which were dismissed because the issues raised were judicial in nature.[12] Complainant also disclosed that before his sala, respondent filed eighteen (18) repetitious and prohibited pleadings.[13]

Complainant Samson Sindon charged respondent Raphiel Alzate, Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court (RTC)-Branch 1, Bangued, Abra and Atty. Janice Siganay Querrer, Clerk of Court of the same court with violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019 (RA 3019), [1] Section 5 of Republic Act No. 6713 (RA 6713) [2] and Section 1 of Rule 137 of the Rules of Court.This case is an offshoot of the administrative Complaint 1 filed by Tomas P. Tan, Jr. (complainant) against Atty. Haide V. Gumba (respondent), and for which respondent was suspended from the practice of law for six months. The issues now ripe for resolution are: a) whether respondent disobeyed a lawful order of the Court by not abiding by the order of her … ….

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Complainant vs respondent. Possible cause: Not clear complainant vs respondent.

Before the Court is the verified affidavit-complaint [1] of Pacita Caalim-Verzonilla seeking the disbarment of respondent Atty. Victoriano G. Pascua for allegedly falsifying a public document and evading the payment of correct taxes through the use of falsified documents.The complainant argues that the resolution issued by the Secretary of Justice directing the withdrawal of the information against him exonerated him from all charges, thereby warranting his immediate release from detention, was a proper basis for bringing the complaint for disbarment against the respondents upon learning that they had filed the ...WINSTON BRIAN CHIA LAO AND CHRISTOPHER TROY CHIA LAO, RESPONDENTS; G.R. No. 207075, February 10, 2020 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON NATURALIZATION (SCN), PETITIONERS, v. JON NICHOLAS CHIA LAO, RESPONDENT.

On June 14, 1992, complainant Angelita C. Orcino filed with this Court a letter-complaint dated December 10, 1991 against respondent Atty. Josue Gaspar, her former counsel. Complainant prayed that this Court impose disciplinary sanctions on respondent for abandoning his duties and for failing to return the legal fees she fully paid for his ...Before us is a Complaint-Affidavit [1] filed by Bryce Russel Mitchell (complainant) against respondent Atty. Juan Paolo F. Amistoso (Atty. Amistoso), docketed as A.C. No. 10713 for violation of Lawyer's Oath and Code of Professional Responsibility. The facts are as follows: Complainant Bryce Russel Mitchell, a citizen of Canada, married, and with residence at 848-F …

kansas football radio Before us is a complaint for disbarment [1] filed by Arty. Mylene S. Yumul-Espina (complainant) against Atty. Benedicto D. Tabaquero (respondent) before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP). Complainant charged respondent with violating Canon 1 [2] of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR), specifically Rules 1.01, [3] 1.02 [4 ...Complainant vs Respondent. Adams v. Genna's Lounge pdf , MEOC Case No. 3327 (Ex. Dec. 4/19/94) Affiliated Carriage Systems, Inc., v. Equal Opportunities Commission of the City of Madison, 92 CV 2714 (Dane County Cir. Ct. 2/25/93) See Perez v. Affiliated Carriage Systems pdf. Allen v. craigslist leitchfield kentuckyopperession Linked numbers below refer to the DS numbers of the cases concerned. Place your mouse over the link to see the title of the dispute; click to go to the page for that dispute. Lower on this page there are tables of which country/territory complained against which, and which country/territory has been complained against by which. phd programs in strategic management On June 14, 1992, complainant Angelita C. Orcino filed with this Court a letter-complaint dated December 10, 1991 against respondent Atty. Josue Gaspar, her former counsel. Complainant prayed that this Court impose disciplinary sanctions on respondent for abandoning his duties and for failing to return the legal fees she fully paid for his ...Atty. Nora M. Saludares, Complainant and Atty. Reynaldo Saludares, respondent were married on. February 7, 1987. However, despite being lawfully married, respondent admitted to having an affair with a. former classmate in high school. During a family recollection in April of 2014, respondent confessed having. strategic missionkubandfish venom For the Court's resolution is a Complaint [1] dated November 27, 2014 filed before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) by complainant Nicolas Robert Martin Egger (complainant) against respondent Atty. Francisco P. Duran (respondent), praying that the latter be meted disciplinary sanctions for his failure to perform his undertaking as counsel and to return … euless apartments all bills paid Plaintiff. A plaintiff (Π in legal shorthand) is the party who initiates a lawsuit (also known as an action) before a court. By doing so, the plaintiff seeks a legal remedy. Respondent. A respondent is a person who is called upon to issue a response to a communication made by another. The term is used in legal contexts, in survey methodology ... JULY 9, 2018. A.C. No. 8962. JILDO A. GUBATON, Complainant vs. ATTY. AUGUSTUS SERAFIN D.AMADOR, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. PERLAS-BERNABE, J.: This administrative case arose from an affidavit-complaint 1 for disbarment filed by complainant Jildo A. Gubaton (complainant) against respondent Atty. Augustus Serafin D. Amador … kshsaa baseball regionals 2022sand dunes in kansasroosevelt overstreet advertisement. Angel L. Bautista v. Atty. Ramon A. Gonzales A.M. No. 1625 February 12, 1990 FACTS: On July 15, 1976, complainant submitted an amended complaint for disbarment On April 11, 1989, the Solicitor General submitted his report with the recommendation that Atty. Ramon A. Gonzales be suspended for six (6) months.